It seems that more often than not, I hear the term ‘technical’ being used by some instructors or trainers as a way to describe how they teach, how to differentiate themselves, or how to make their programs sound more refined and scientific. In the process of learning, some students can become frustrated with the so-called complexity of certain moves or be impressed with the so-called technicality of it. In general, to be technical is to be able to execute and apply moves in textbook fashion. This is how some trainers differentiate themselves. They may break down each movement of a particular punch or kick, for instance. Or they may add other types of drills to enhance the development of a specific skill such as footwork. Whatever the approach maybe, the word ‘technical’ seems to be thrown around everywhere. I’m not saying that breaking down a move or adding more drills to enhance performance is a bad thing. Actually, it’s a plus since there’s plenty of places that lack this service. But being ‘technical’ should include more than just having a detailed explanation of a given move. It should include the advance techniques themselves, how they can be modified in different situations, as well as the analysis of fighting as a whole and where a technique or specific set of techniques would best be utilized. (more…)